Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- project:wwwcccde:migration [16.09.2013 04:52] – [Tagging (RFC)] q-rai
+++ project:wwwcccde:migration [17.09.2013 07:59] (aktuell) – [Tagging (RFC)] ebrnd
@@ Zeile 83: / Zeile 83: @@
   - too many tags >= too few tags
   - no synonyms---check list of existing tags before introducing new ones
-  - just because something's in the article's title doesn't mean it should also be a tag. I want to find *all* relevant articles by clicking on a tag.  // Put emphasis on relevant?
+  - just because something's in the article's title doesn't mean it should also be a tag. I want to find *all* relevant articles by clicking on a tag.  // Put emphasis on relevant? //
   - Tags should be all lower-case. Spaces and German umläuts as long as Wordpress supports it (afaik both is supported)
-==What warrants a tag?==
+=== What warrants a tag? ===
 Tags are supposed to make finding related articles easier by quickly summing up the contents.
@@ Zeile 103: / Zeile 104: @@
   * articles containing a link to a video should be tagged with "video".
     * what about pictures?
+      * Not 100% sure. The idea behind the "video" tag was that users who are reading using a cellphone (limited bandwidth, small screen) or can't use headphones or loudspeakers at the moment for some reason can skip over articles which require watching a video (which often relies on an audio track as well) to get the message across.
+      * I propose: Tag articles with images with "pic", and articles with videos with "video", if and only if the picture / video is the *main content* of the article. If the message is delivered using plain text, and the picutre / video is just a supplement, don't use the picture / video tag.